Some people think that younger people are not suitable for important positions in governments of countries. Others argue that younger people have new ideas in these positions. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for that? Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Will you vote for a 30-year-old young man to be the mayor in your city? Perhaps in this situation, it is not easy for you to make a decision. Via this essay, I aim to help you with some analyses of the benefits as well as the drawbacks on this issue.
From my perspective, it is the truth that the young can bring a great number of new ideas and change to the development of our society. The government of China, for instance, stimulates graduates as officers to contribute themselves to the construction of the countryside. To our joy, most of the country areas have put on new looks ; thanks to the performance of these young people. What’s more, as the new generations are better educated, they are capable to deal with a majority of problems with specialized knowledge of diverse aspect. If an elder officer was assigned to design a reasonable setting of the traffic lights, he or she might have to conduct lots of experiments. However, a younger qualified man can accomplish this task using statistics in just a few days. From these two points, it is appropriate to appoint younger people to take some important positions in the government.
In contrast, we have to take a view of another side of the coin. Initially, since young men are always the freshmen In politics, they are in fact lacking experience. When the economic crisis comes, we cannot expect these youngsters to save the world of commerce successfully. Also, younger people are less patient and circumspect than elder people when facing a position to reach a certain conclusion. In case that they determine to execute their commands hastily, there maybe a catastrophe to the whole nation.
As far as I am concerned, there are certainly young talents that are suitable for certain positions of the government. Nonetheless, they should be considered more cautiously with strict tests when choosing new members for the government.